What’s the difference between risk and BIA?

Risk management assesses threats to assets; the BIA measures the impact of interrupting a process. They complement each other: one prioritizes controls, the other prioritizes recovery.

Do you use a particular methodology?

We align with ISO 31000 and adapt the methodology to each organization’s context and maturity.

Is it useful for certification?

Yes. The risk process is a core requirement of ISO/IEC 27001 and other standards; we leave it audit-ready.

How does Complyze help?

Complyze keeps the risk register, the action plans and the KRIs centralized and traceable. It is a platform by i-Prot, in active development.

Solutions · Risk management & BIA

Manage your risks with evidence, not intuition.

We identify, assess and treat your organization’s risks, and analyze the impact on the business to prioritize what really matters.

Request a diagnostic Talk to a specialist

diagram · solutions · risk management & bia

The client’s problem

Without a formal process, risks are managed by perception: investment goes where there’s noise, not where there’s real exposure. Decisions can’t be justified to leadership or auditors, and the impact of an incident on the business is left unsized.

Risks of not acting

Misdirected investment

Resources spent on minor risks while the critical ones go untreated.

Unsupported decisions

Impossible to justify priorities to leadership or auditors.

Unknown impact

No one knows what interrupting a key process would cost.

Improvised continuity

Without a BIA, incident recovery is reactive and slow.

The i-Prot proposal

We implement a risk management process aligned with ISO 31000 and a business impact analysis (BIA), integrated into the CGF cycle. The result: a living risk register, prioritized by impact and value, with traceable decisions and measurable treatment plans.

Working model

Context and assets

Deliverable: scope, asset inventory and critical processes.

Risk assessment

Deliverable: risk register with likelihood and impact.

Impact analysis (BIA)

Deliverable: RTO/RPO and prioritization of critical processes.

Treatment plan

Deliverable: plan prioritized by risk, cost and value.

Follow-up

Deliverable: key risk indicators (KRIs) and periodic review.

Scope

Context, assets and processes
Risk assessment methodology
Risk assessment and BIA
Prioritized treatment plan
Indicator (KRI) tracking
Technical implementation of controls (separate project)
Third-party software licenses
Hardware infrastructure

Deliverables

Initial diagnostic
Governance model
Risk & controls matrix
Prioritized roadmap
Decision criteria
Indicators
Evidence
Executive presentation

Benefits

Prioritized investment

Resources applied to the risks that matter most.

Defensible decisions

Priorities justified to leadership and auditors.

Prepared continuity

Impact sized and recovery planned.

Multiframework foundation

Reusable risks for ISO 27001, 22301 and more.

How it connects with CGF and Complyze

This solution mainly covers the Assess, Prioritize and Operate & measure stages of the cycle.

Complyze centralizes the risk register, the action plans and the KRIs, and keeps the treatment status visible over time.

a platform by i-Prot

Applicable frameworks

Use cases

Risk register for the regulator

Risks and BIA to meet BCRA requirements.

Investment prioritization

A security roadmap based on risk and impact.

Continuity of critical services

A BIA over key care-delivery processes.

Frequently asked questions

Let’s start by understanding your risks

Tell us your context and we’ll propose a tailored risk assessment.

By submitting you accept our privacy policy.

You may also be interested in

Gobierno de ciberseguridadConocé tu nivel real de exposición y gobernalo.View page →Compliance y SGSICumplí y certificá, con un sistema de gestión que se sostiene.View page →CyberSOCDetección y respuesta gestionada, 24x7.View page →